Competing risk is better than composite outcome to identify renal biomarker outcome
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Authors Reply: Response to “Competing risk analysis is better than composite outcome to identify renal dysfunction biomarker”
The Authors Reply We thank Drs. Matthieu and Jerome for their interest1 in our study2 and agree that the interpretation of our composite outcome should not be extrapolated to isolated AKI progression. A major goal of our study was to examine whether AKI biomarkers provide overall prognostic information in patients with AKI. We included death in our composite outcome based on its strong associat...
متن کاملRenal transplantation outcome in children with cystinosis
Background and Objective: Cystinosis is a rare inherited disease that leads to renal failure. Fanconi syndrome is the major renal involvement in cystinosis patients. Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in cystinosis children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The study aimed to assess the outcome of renal transplantation in Iranian children with cystinosis. Methods: This...
متن کاملMinimal Stimulation In Vitro Fertilization: A Better Outcome
advantages of mild-stimulation have long been appreciated, while there was a called for more patient-friendly approach in ovarian stimulation around 20 years ago (1)...
متن کامل24-Hour ICH Score Is a Better Predictor of Outcome than Admission ICH Score
BACKGROUND The ICH score is a validated tool for predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. AIMS AND/OR HYPOTHESIS The aim of this study is to determine if the ICH score calculated 24 hours after admission is a better predictor of mortality than the ICH score calculated on admission. METHODS Patients presenting to our center with ICH from 7/08-12/10...
متن کاملMDS-specific comorbidity index is useful to identify myelodysplastic patients who can have better outcome with 5-azacitidine.
According to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html): “Authorship credit should be based on: 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the versio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Kidney International
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0085-2538
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.221